AI-Powered Peer Review

Expert referee reports for your economics papers

Upload your working paper and receive detailed referee reports from AI agents specializing in network economics. Each reviewer brings a distinct methodological lens to your work.

Get Started Free Log In

5 free review credits for new accounts. No credit card required.

How it works

Four steps to expert feedback on your research.

Upload your paper

Upload your working paper in PDF, Word, or LaTeX format. We extract the content and identify the topic area.

Choose your reviewers

Select from our pool of AI referee agents, each modeled after a leading economist with distinct expertise and review style.

Get detailed reports

Receive separate referee reports with scores, strengths, comments, and recommendations — just like a real journal review.

Compare & Improve

Compare reports side-by-side, identify consensus, and track how your paper improves with each revision.

Meet the reviewers

Each AI referee brings a unique perspective to evaluating your work.

Network Theory Referee

GoyalAI

Distills the domain expertise, research style, and academic judgements of Sanjeev Goyal.

Insight over technique, parsimony, and complete characterization.

network theoryapplied micro theorystrategy

Behavioral Experiment Referee

GneezyAI

Distills the domain expertise, research style, and academic judgements of Uri Gneezy.

Practical insight, clear storytelling, and sharp incentive logic.

field experimentsbehavioral economicsincentives

Network Applied Micro Referee

ZenouAI

Distills the domain expertise, research style, and academic judgements of Yves Zenou.

Formal discipline, explicit mechanisms, and model-driven empirics.

network empiricslaborurbancrime

Epistemic Game Theory Referee

BattigalliAI

Distills the domain expertise, research style, and academic judgements of Pierpaolo Battigalli.

Conceptual clarity first, rigorous epistemic foundations second.

game theorybeliefsambiguitypsychological games

Behavioral Theory Referee

DufwenbergAI

Distills the domain expertise, research style, and academic judgements of Martin Dufwenberg.

Take motivations seriously and connect theory to actual behavior.

behavioral theorypsychology in economicstheory+experiment

Mechanism Design Referee

MilgromAI

Distills the domain expertise, research style, and academic judgements of Paul Milgrom.

Generality, rigor, and practical relevance in institutional design.

mechanism designauctionsindustrial organization

Institutions & Political Economy Referee

AcemogluAI

Distills the domain expertise, research style, and academic judgements of Daron Acemoglu.

Causal identification, broad mechanisms, and societal implications.

institutionspolitical economyautomationdevelopment economicsapplied theory

Empirical Opportunity & Mobility Referee

ChettyAI

Distills the domain expertise, research style, and academic judgements of Raj Chetty.

Administrative data, causal credibility, magnitudes over significance.

economic mobilityinequalityeducation economicshealth economicssocial policy

Natural Field Experiment Referee

ListAI

Distills the domain expertise, research style, and academic judgements of John List.

Real-world tests over lab proxies; does the mechanism survive outside the lab?

natural field experimentscharitable givingdiscriminationenvironmental economicsmarket design

Simple, transparent pricing

Start free. Upgrade when you need more.

Free

Credits / month5 (one-time)
File formatsPDF only
AI reviewersAll 8
Processing speedStandard
Report comparison—
Target journal matching—
Nominate new reviewers—
SupportCommunity

Frequently asked questions

Everything you need to know about RefereeAI.

RefereeAI is designed for economics working papers, journal submissions, and dissertations. It works best with empirical and theoretical economics research, including applied micro, macro, econometrics, and related fields.

Our AI referees model the style and analytical approach of leading economists. While they don't replace human peer review, they provide structured, substantive feedback that mirrors the depth and rigor of top journal referee reports.

Yes. You can select 1 to 3 reviewers from our pool of AI referee agents. Each has a distinct expertise area and review style, so you can tailor the feedback to your paper's methodology and field.

Most reviews complete in 30–90 seconds per reviewer. You'll receive a notification when your reports are ready, and you can view them directly in your dashboard.

Yes. Papers are stored securely with encryption at rest and in transit. We never share your papers with third parties, and you can delete your data at any time from your account settings.

We currently support PDF, Word (.docx), and LaTeX (.tex) files. PDF is recommended for the best extraction quality. We plan to add more formats in the future.

Absolutely. Upload your revised paper and run a new review. You can compare reports across versions to track how your paper improves with each revision.

New accounts receive 5 free credits. Each AI reviewer costs 1 credit per review. Pro subscribers get 15 credits/month, Max subscribers get 45 credits/month. Paid plans also let you nominate new reviewers to be added to the system.

Ready to get feedback on your paper?

Start with 5 free review credits. No credit card required.

Create Free Account